![]() Read, Stephen and Bos, Egbert P., (eds.), 2001, Concepts: The Treatises of Thomas of Cleves and Paul of Gelria: An Edition and Systematic Introduction, Louvain: Peeters.in Kretzmann and Stump 1988, 216-61 [fallacies of Peter of Spain, T, Tractatus, called afterwards.Peter of Ailly, TE, Tractatus exponibilium,.Panaccio, Claude, 2004, Ockham on Concepts, Aldershot: Ashgate.Mittelalter’, in Wilpert 1963, 71-91 [distinguishes Oeing-Hanhoff, L., 1963, ‘Die Methoden der Metaphysik im.Nicholas of Paris, S, Syncategoremata, selections.–––, 1979, ‘Propositional Analysis in Fourteenth-Century.Philosophy’, in Medieval and Renaissance Studies 7, ed. –––, 1978, ‘The Development of a Critical Temper: NewĪpproaches and Modes of Analysis in Fourteenth-Century.Murdoch, John E., 1975, ‘A Central Method of Analysis inįourteenth-Century Science’, XIVth International Congress of.Philosophical introduction, London: Routledge [297-301: –––, 2007, Medieval Philosophy: An historical and.Logic’ 89-90: ‘historical analysis’ as approach to Marenbon, John, 1987, Later Medieval Philosophy.Proclus’, in Blumenthal and Lloyd 1982, 18-45 Lloyd, A.C., 1982, ‘Procession and Division in.[includes Boethius OD Nicholas of Paris S Peter of Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, Vol. and Stump, E., (eds.), 1988, The Cambridge The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge:Ĭambridge University Press [includes L. [exponible propositions as involving syncategoremata, requiring Kretzmann, Norman, 1982, ‘Syncategoremata, exponibilia,.Thijssen and Jack Zupko, (eds.), The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan, Leiden: E. Klima, Gyula, 2000, ‘Buridan’s Theory of Definitions in his Scientific Practice’, in J.M.M.H.Jardine, Lisa, 1982, ‘Humanism and the Teaching of.Thomas’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et Isaac, J., 1950, ‘La Notion de Dialectique chez Saint.Kohlhammer [opposition between analysis and abstraction in relation Hönigswald, Richard, 1961, Abstraktion und Analysis: Einīeitrag zur Problemgeschichte des Universalienstreites in der.II, 526a-b: resolution as regression distinction between Sheldon-Williams, Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1968 Erigena, John Scot, Periphyseon, 4 vols., ed.Loose senses of resolution and composition] Théologique et Philosophique 6 [distinguishes strict and Speculative and Practical Discourse’, Laval Dolan, Edmund, 1950, ‘Resolution and Composition in.Crombie, A.C., 1953, Robert Grosseteste and the Origins ofĮxperimental Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press [61-90:.and Evans, T.A.R., (eds.), 1992, History of the Interpretation as ‘exposition’ Treatise 8: division,ĭefinition and demonstration Treatise 9: sophisms] Gyula Klima, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001 [Treatise 6, ch. Buridan, John, SD, Summulae de Dialectica, tr.Broadie, Alexander, 1985, The Circle of John Mair, Oxford:.Simplicius, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press [includes Lloyd Structure of Being in Late Neo-Platonism: Syrianus, Proclus and and Lloyd, A.C., (eds.), 1982, Soul and the Oxford’, in Catto and Evans 1992, 35-64 [theory of and Spade, P.V., 1992, ‘Logic in Late Medieval Ashworth, E.J., 1973, ‘The Doctrine of Exponibilia in theįifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries’, Vivarium 11,.Aquinas, Thomas, SW, Selected Writings of ThomasĪquinas, ed.Resolutionis in Thomas Aquinas’, Modern Schoolman Aertsen, Jan A., 1989, ‘Method and Metaphysics: The via.Cross-references to other (sub)sections are provided inĪnnotated Bibliography on Analysis: Full List of Sections 3.1 Medieval Philosophy They are cited under each heading but duplication has been kept to a Where works include important material under more than one heading, Medieval and Renaissance Conceptions of Analysis. Subsections of the supplementary document on This section of the bibliography corresponds to Section 3 of the mainĮntry, and is divided into subsections which correspond to the In some cases where there is material available online, an internet Linked from the relevant entry and note by means of Key passagesĬan be found quoted in the supplementary document onĭefinitions and Descriptions of Analysis, Work and/or its significance to the topic of analysis. Notes in squareīrackets at the end of an entry indicate the relevant part(s) of the Cross-references are by name(s) ofĪuthor(s) or editor(s) and either year of publication or abbreviationĪs indicated immediately after their name(s). That deal, in whole or in part, with analysis and related topics suchĪs analyticity and definition. This bibliography is intended as a reference guide to the key works §3: Medieval and Renaissance Conceptions of Analysis
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |